<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Playboy from the 60s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.funtasticus.com/2008/01/18/playboy-from-the-60s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2008/01/18/playboy-from-the-60s/</link>
	<description>Funtasticus.com provides the best entertainment on the web. Daily issues with jokes, humor, videos, pictures and much more! Dont miss out!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:37:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Insomnia</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2008/01/18/playboy-from-the-60s/comment-page-1/#comment-14364</link>
		<dc:creator>Insomnia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 01:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funtasticus.com/20080118/playboy-from-the-60s/#comment-14364</guid>
		<description>All such truthful! not usually.Especially not sunburnt places :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All such truthful! not usually.Especially not sunburnt places <img src='http://www.funtasticus.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2008/01/18/playboy-from-the-60s/comment-page-1/#comment-14362</link>
		<dc:creator>carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funtasticus.com/20080118/playboy-from-the-60s/#comment-14362</guid>
		<description>las chicas me exitaron mucho pero creo que deberian enseñar mas la vagina para exitarse mas a por sierto tienen unas tetas enormes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>las chicas me exitaron mucho pero creo que deberian enseñar mas la vagina para exitarse mas a por sierto tienen unas tetas enormes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2008/01/18/playboy-from-the-60s/comment-page-1/#comment-9862</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funtasticus.com/20080118/playboy-from-the-60s/#comment-9862</guid>
		<description>Time has changed everything how woman look and men as well. Is just the sign of times is all and changing of style. The women where sexy back then and they are sexy now. We have changed as a culture nothing more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time has changed everything how woman look and men as well. Is just the sign of times is all and changing of style. The women where sexy back then and they are sexy now. We have changed as a culture nothing more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy S</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2008/01/18/playboy-from-the-60s/comment-page-1/#comment-8732</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funtasticus.com/20080118/playboy-from-the-60s/#comment-8732</guid>
		<description>I hate to bust your bubble guys.  Photoshop or digital manipulation of photographs may have been unknown in the 1960s but airbrushing out certain details (e.g. skin blemishes or pubic hair) was commonly practiced by Playboy and other magazines.

Cosmetic surgery wasn&#039;t unkown either, breast augmentation came in around the mid-60s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to bust your bubble guys.  Photoshop or digital manipulation of photographs may have been unknown in the 1960s but airbrushing out certain details (e.g. skin blemishes or pubic hair) was commonly practiced by Playboy and other magazines.</p>
<p>Cosmetic surgery wasn&#8217;t unkown either, breast augmentation came in around the mid-60s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evil1</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2008/01/18/playboy-from-the-60s/comment-page-1/#comment-1834</link>
		<dc:creator>evil1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funtasticus.com/20080118/playboy-from-the-60s/#comment-1834</guid>
		<description>FYI: These women are old enough to be your moms or grandmas by now. Oh yeah, by the way... Damn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI: These women are old enough to be your moms or grandmas by now. Oh yeah, by the way&#8230; Damn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L.Linus</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2008/01/18/playboy-from-the-60s/comment-page-1/#comment-1833</link>
		<dc:creator>L.Linus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funtasticus.com/20080118/playboy-from-the-60s/#comment-1833</guid>
		<description>The women of the past were more sexy and natural.   I love women with pubic hair and alot of it, so that&#039;s my era.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The women of the past were more sexy and natural.   I love women with pubic hair and alot of it, so that&#8217;s my era.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2008/01/18/playboy-from-the-60s/comment-page-1/#comment-1832</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funtasticus.com/20080118/playboy-from-the-60s/#comment-1832</guid>
		<description>2nd picture resembles late Jackie Kennedy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2nd picture resembles late Jackie Kennedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flo</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2008/01/18/playboy-from-the-60s/comment-page-1/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>flo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funtasticus.com/20080118/playboy-from-the-60s/#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>watch this, if you want to see some makeup plus photoshop magic!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcFlxSlOKNI&amp;feature=related</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>watch this, if you want to see some makeup plus photoshop magic!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcFlxSlOKNI&amp;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcFlxSlOKNI&amp;feature=related</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flo</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2008/01/18/playboy-from-the-60s/comment-page-1/#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>flo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funtasticus.com/20080118/playboy-from-the-60s/#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>well the question is, why are they hotter now, if they really are?
is it because of our new understanding of beauty or because they grow better nowadays or because of plastic surgery/photoshop?

its very unlikely that girls just became prettier. if, e.g. you take a look at the young jane fonda, she was GORGEOUS! even compared to todays standards she would be one or maybe even the most attractive women in the film biz.

sure, now and back then beauty was in the eye of the beholder, so its hard to say what is actually hotter...


@ Jeff
and about the pubes: yes, back then that part was left to our imagination. close ups of certain areas of the female gender might be hot to wank to, but never were &quot;sexy&quot;... just pure sex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well the question is, why are they hotter now, if they really are?<br />
is it because of our new understanding of beauty or because they grow better nowadays or because of plastic surgery/photoshop?</p>
<p>its very unlikely that girls just became prettier. if, e.g. you take a look at the young jane fonda, she was GORGEOUS! even compared to todays standards she would be one or maybe even the most attractive women in the film biz.</p>
<p>sure, now and back then beauty was in the eye of the beholder, so its hard to say what is actually hotter&#8230;</p>
<p>@ Jeff<br />
and about the pubes: yes, back then that part was left to our imagination. close ups of certain areas of the female gender might be hot to wank to, but never were &#8220;sexy&#8221;&#8230; just pure sex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jupiter</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2008/01/18/playboy-from-the-60s/comment-page-1/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>Jupiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://funtasticus.com/20080118/playboy-from-the-60s/#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>The girls are hotter now, but they were sexier then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The girls are hotter now, but they were sexier then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
