World War II Aerography on Planes

I doubt whether aerography on planes was the best way to cheer up troops, but it was definitely something that could distinguish the US air force from the rest. Moreover, it proves that aerography has a long and rich history.

aerography002_1

aerography003_2

aerography004_3

aerography005_4

aerography006_5

aerography007_6

aerography008_7

aerography009_8

aerography010_9

aerography011_10

aerography012_11

aerography013_12

aerography014_13

aerography015_14

aerography016_15


Related Posts with Thumbnails
Filed under: Around the Globe, Daily Pictures



4 Comments

  1. Posted April 23, 2008 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

    Cool photos!

  2. Posted April 23, 2008 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    I love these and have added them to our site http://www.snapme.ca Thanks for the find!

  3. Steve
    Posted April 27, 2008 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    This isn’t aerography…

    Aerography is a meteorological term, and is in fact something of a synonym to the word meteorology itself.

    The term aerography does seem to have been applied to the use of three dimensional objects in lieu of stencils or other traditional masks while working with sprayed mediums to create a work of art… but this association with art is an incorrect usage of the word. However, this is a world in which people pronounce ‘ask’ as ‘aks’, ‘escape’ as ‘ekscape’, and many think that ‘irregardless’ is a proper and correct word in the English language. So I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised.

    Anyway, even if you consider ‘aerography’, as defined above, to be a valid art term, this artwork on aircraft from WWII most definitely does NOT fall within that category.

    These days this stuff is called ‘nose art’ because the majority of the artwork was placed on the nose of an aircraft. (It was not known as such during the war… the term was coined afterward, possibly in the late 40s or the 50s… or who knows when…) More often than not, relatively few stencils or masks were used. The majority of personal artwork applied to US military aircraft in WWII was drawn out with grease pencil or chalk, and painted by hand with brushes… using whatever paints were available. There have even been instances of crayon being used!

    You are indeed correct in stating that the widespread adornment of US military aircraft (mostly in the USAAF) with ‘nose art’ did set our air arms apart from those of other nations. But I know for a fact that you vastly underestimate its value as a morale booster. After talking with hundreds, and reading about the experiences of thousands of AAF vets, it’s quite clear that even the little things made all the difference in the world when they were overseas for years at a time…

    I don’t say any of this to put you down in any way… I merely seek to state the facts as only an artistically-inclined, former USAF weatherman who’s nuts for things with wings can. On the contrary, I applaud you for posting this stuff here. The more people are made aware of such things, the better…

  4. anonymus
    Posted July 20, 2008 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    Funny!! Ha Ha!

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Polls

    Pick the Super Bowl winner



    Loading ... Loading ...

  • Get Funtasticus by email:


    Delivered by FeedBurner
  • FUNTASTICA TOOLS

    Add to Google




Loading...
Don't Miss A Post
Get Funtasticus Delivered!