<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our Body</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.funtasticus.com/2009/01/15/our-body/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2009/01/15/our-body/</link>
	<description>Funtasticus.com provides the best entertainment on the web. Daily issues with jokes, humor, videos, pictures and much more! Dont miss out!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:37:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jordan</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2009/01/15/our-body/comment-page-1/#comment-15948</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funtasticus.com/?p=8420#comment-15948</guid>
		<description>Save an image, open in photoshop and invert it - you&#039;ll see the original image. Its a simple monotone negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Save an image, open in photoshop and invert it &#8211; you&#8217;ll see the original image. Its a simple monotone negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swede</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2009/01/15/our-body/comment-page-1/#comment-13980</link>
		<dc:creator>Swede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 14:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funtasticus.com/?p=8420#comment-13980</guid>
		<description>Solarisation creates lines around contrast areas, which these haven&#039;t. Also these look perfectly normal when viewed as negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solarisation creates lines around contrast areas, which these haven&#8217;t. Also these look perfectly normal when viewed as negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roberto</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2009/01/15/our-body/comment-page-1/#comment-13759</link>
		<dc:creator>roberto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funtasticus.com/?p=8420#comment-13759</guid>
		<description>people solarisation will accomplish this process. that is, of course, when done with film not digitally....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people solarisation will accomplish this process. that is, of course, when done with film not digitally&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nuno Lagoa</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2009/01/15/our-body/comment-page-1/#comment-13748</link>
		<dc:creator>Nuno Lagoa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funtasticus.com/?p=8420#comment-13748</guid>
		<description>There are two ways to make pics like this. Solarisation is one of them. The other, for more hard-core photographers (not necessarily porn photographers:-) is to overexpose with a very harsh flash and then show the negative. That means that what would appear as too light or too dark in the negative would actually turn out as a midtone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two ways to make pics like this. Solarisation is one of them. The other, for more hard-core photographers (not necessarily porn photographers:-) is to overexpose with a very harsh flash and then show the negative. That means that what would appear as too light or too dark in the negative would actually turn out as a midtone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2009/01/15/our-body/comment-page-1/#comment-13653</link>
		<dc:creator>Federico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funtasticus.com/?p=8420#comment-13653</guid>
		<description>dur is absolutely right.  Not solarisation (this is another process) and not infrared (this is another film).  A little wikipedia and google wont harm nobody.  The worst part is when someone cannot do a little research and claim something to be true, when it just isn´t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dur is absolutely right.  Not solarisation (this is another process) and not infrared (this is another film).  A little wikipedia and google wont harm nobody.  The worst part is when someone cannot do a little research and claim something to be true, when it just isn´t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoodlum</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2009/01/15/our-body/comment-page-1/#comment-13642</link>
		<dc:creator>hoodlum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 05:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funtasticus.com/?p=8420#comment-13642</guid>
		<description>any of these effects can be produced in photoshop. definatly more impressive though if the photographer does it from actual film with no editing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>any of these effects can be produced in photoshop. definatly more impressive though if the photographer does it from actual film with no editing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dil Ka Dr</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2009/01/15/our-body/comment-page-1/#comment-13634</link>
		<dc:creator>Dil Ka Dr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funtasticus.com/?p=8420#comment-13634</guid>
		<description>pretty strange ideas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty strange ideas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Silver</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2009/01/15/our-body/comment-page-1/#comment-13615</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Silver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funtasticus.com/?p=8420#comment-13615</guid>
		<description>black and white, but in the negative. i think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>black and white, but in the negative. i think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dur</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2009/01/15/our-body/comment-page-1/#comment-13598</link>
		<dc:creator>dur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funtasticus.com/?p=8420#comment-13598</guid>
		<description>open in photoshop and press cmd-i. There you have it. To complete the effect though, the photographer has lit the images from below to give the semblance that the &#039;light&#039; in the negatives is coming from above, as our eyes and brain would expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>open in photoshop and press cmd-i. There you have it. To complete the effect though, the photographer has lit the images from below to give the semblance that the &#8216;light&#8217; in the negatives is coming from above, as our eyes and brain would expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dur</title>
		<link>http://www.funtasticus.com/2009/01/15/our-body/comment-page-1/#comment-13597</link>
		<dc:creator>dur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 02:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.funtasticus.com/?p=8420#comment-13597</guid>
		<description>as a matter of fact, roberto, all of the ones I&#039;ve just opened are indeed negatives. Now, apologise for YOUR ignorance, and arrogance to the nice gif bin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as a matter of fact, roberto, all of the ones I&#8217;ve just opened are indeed negatives. Now, apologise for YOUR ignorance, and arrogance to the nice gif bin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
